Individuo libero o Comunità sicura? Fai la tua scelta, sbaglierai in ogni caso. La modernità liquida ha dato i natali ad un nuovo simpatico pendolo antropologico . Ad una nuova linea sfumata. Gli antipodi have freedom and security.
"Roberta was an old lady of 24 years with the addiction to gambling. Heads and tails were his delights. He drank a lot and was always too much or too little hydrated. He played for the next 24 years without a single day jump ever. His favorite game after game of Russian roulette? Clearly heads or tails. That evening the bar was the usual juice, grapefruit juice and good old 100 lira coin. First pitch: Head. Under fire: the Cross. The third shot stopped in the balance on the board. BOOM! "
Come in ogni grande dualismo che si rispetti non esiste soluzione (è giusto cercarla?). I due lati della stessa medaglia libertà o sicurezza si contendono il primato? Una facciata esclude automaticamente l’altra? L’analisi fino ad ora ha delineato come “il pendolo” stia decisamente oscillando dal lato della libertà, privando così l’umanità della sicurezza che dopo la seconda guerra mondiale ha tanto ostinatamente ricercato.
Tale fatto ha dato luogo a reazioni le più differenti. Il comunitarismo risponde negandosi l’eccesso of freedom, is deploying across all the side of safety. L ' individualism claimed the current condition of trying to ride the wave right. Outside the door is nihilism.
awareness, the ability to read the situation to pull himself out of the game so you have the right vision of the phenomena. Nihilism does not mean refusing to fight, and fight according to new rules, are not in force, but the most apt to the scenario in the making. Studying new routes .
